 by Alfred Lambremont
Webre Seattle Exopolitics
Examiner September 27, 2010
from Examiner Website
For the first
time since the early days of the presidency of Barack Obama in 2009, a
wave of scheduled or predicted events around the theme of ‘official’
disclosure of extraterrestrial life to the human civilization of Earth
appears to be surging.
The early days of the Obama administration
were rife with rumors that ET ‘disclosure is imminent’ and one observer predicted,
“An official
announcement by the Obama administration disclosing the reality of
extraterrestrial life is imminent.”
In fact, Barack
Obama’s failure to make ET disclosure turned out to be the top UFO/ET story of
2009.
As of today, almost a year to the day since the
2009 Obama ‘ET disclosure wave’ started, a new 2010 ‘ET disclosure wave
has begun to surge.
The 2010 ET disclosure wave is focused around a
new set of institutions from the Obama administration - an announcement of
an appointment of a person - and then an official denial of this UN
appointment - for ‘contact by extraterrestrial civilizations’ at the
United Nations, a National Press Club Press conference by U.S. and U.K.
nuclear missile UFO whistleblowers, and the Denver ET Affairs November
2010 vote.
An in-depth evaluation of each of these ‘drivers’ in the
2010 ET disclosure wave reveals deep conflicts around what
'extraterrestrial contact' may mean to the SETI ‘search for the
extraterrestrial presence’ paradigm as used by the United Nations personnel
and bodies, and the UFO and Exopolitics paradigm of ‘extraterrestrial
disclosure’ used by citizen-driven initiatives such as the nuclear missile
UFO whistleblowers and the proponents of the Denver Extraterrestrials
Affairs commission.
The confusion and false expectations of the
2009 ET disclosure wave must be avoided at all costs in the new 2010 ET
disclosure wave now surging.
Dr Mazlan
Othman & the UN: Just what does ‘extraterrestrial contact’ mean?
In some deep sense, there is
still a deep chasm of mis-understanding and cultural conflict between the
SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) paradigm that for many
years has dominated the discussion at the Royal society and the U.N.
Outer space
office (UNOOSA), and reality of the UFO and extraterrestrial presence that
U.S. nuclear missile UFO whistleblowers, proponents of the Denver ET
Affairs commission, and the UFO and exopolitical research community are
referring to.
It was initially reported that Dr
Mazlan Othman, head of
the UN Outer Space Office (UNOOSA) and former director
of the Malaysian Space Agency, announced she would explain at a
October 4-5, 2010 at a U.K. Royal Society conference on a scientific and
social agenda on extraterrestrial life how a proposal to designate her
office as the official point of contact with extraterrestrial life
will be debated in the U.N. Outer Space Committee,
and if approved, sent to the U.N. General Assembly for a vote.
Then in a public email, Dr. Othman stated,
UN Plan for 'Alien Ambassador' a
Case of Science Fiction?
September 27, 2010
from Guardian Website
Malaysian astrophysicist Mazlan
Othman
denies Sunday Times report that she is
to become Earth's first contact for ETs

ET would have been directed to the UN's
Malaysian astrophysicist Mazlan Othman
if it had landed on Earth today,
according to the Sunday Times.
Photograph:
Allstar/Cinetext/Universal
If a Martian, proverbial or otherwise,
had landed on Earth in the last 24 hours the media had some
practical advice. Or so it seemed.
According to the Sunday Times and
numerous other media outlets that followed up the story, the United
Nations was "poised" to appoint an individual to be the first point
of contact with aliens.
Malaysian astrophysicist Mazlan
Othman was being lined up for the role, the story said. As head of
the UN's Office for Outer Space Affairs (Unoosa) Othman would be
the,
"nearest thing we have to a take me
to you leader [person]", Prof Richard Crowther, from the UK Space
Agency, told the Sunday Times.
According to the paper, Othman is due
to tell a Royal Society conference that as the detection of
extraterrestrial life is more likely than ever, the UN needs to be
ready to co-ordinate humanity's response.
Reading all this
our Martian visitor might have been encouraged to try to get in
touch. They would have had a frustrating time.
The Royal
Society knew nothing about it. The United Nations referred all
queries to the switchboard of UNOOSA in Vienna.
Its switchboard number wasn't much
help.
"The person at extension 4951 is
unavailable, please leave your message after the tone," it said.
Those messages might make for some
interesting listening today.
Finally an email from Othman
herself would have prompted our Martian to trudge back to his
spaceship.
"It sounds really cool but I have to
deny it," she said of the story.
She will be attending a conference next
week, but she'll be talking about how the world deals with
"near-Earth objects".
Our alien will just have to try someone
else, or stop reading the Sunday
Times. |
Other news
reports stated,
"A UN
spokesperson this afternoon told Newslite the story was "nonsense" and
insisted there were no current plans to appointment anyone to the
role.
"Never-mind… we guess this just means any visiting aliens
will have to continue asking to be taken to our leader.
"The
spokesperson said:
"The Office
for Outer Space Affairs, headed by Mazlan Othman, serves as the
secretariat to the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of
Outer Space.
"It carries out activities to promote
international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and
strengthens the use of space science and technology
applications.
"The
mandate of the Office for Outer Space Affairs is defined by the United
Nations General Assembly and there are no plans to change the current
mandate.
"The article in the Sunday Times is
nonsense."
Prior to this
announcement-denial of the UN 'extraterrestrial point of contact,' Dr.
Othman is reported to have said:
“The
continued search for extraterrestrial communication, by several
entities, sustains the hope that some day human kind will received
signals from extraterrestrials.'
“When we do, we should have in
place a coordinated response that takes into account all the
sensitivities related to the subject.
“The UN is a ready-made
mechanism for such coordination.”
The U.N.
General Assembly in 1978 in Decision 33/426 (1978) approved the
establishment of an office to investigate ‘extraterrestrial life’.
That 1978
Decision has not been implemented to date.
A review of the
Committee debates and working papers of the U.N. Outer Space Committee
make it clear that by ‘extraterrestrial contact’ is meant contact of the
sort envisioned by SETI through the reception of radio signals from a
distant point in deep space.
In a fundamental way, this chasm
between the SETI-type contact and an actual physical contact from
extraterrestrial presence around Earth may serve to fuel false
expectations and substantive confusion about what ‘ET contact’ means.
There is a vast
difference between,
-
the sort
of SETI-type radio antenna contact that Dr Mazlan Othman and the rest
of UNOOSA and the UN General Assembly have in mind
-
authentic
disclosure of secret human-extraterrestrial liaison programs of the
U.S. government and the presence around Earth of multiple advanced
intelligent civilizations from other worlds and
dimensions
When Dr Mazlan
Othman (director of the Malaysian Space Agency 2002-7) and the UN speak of
‘extraterrestrial contact,’ they are speaking of a scenario of the return
of radio signals from some distant galaxy via the SETI program.
They are not
speaking of, and will officially fail to confirm, the evidence of an
active extraterrestrial presence on Earth, and of secret human-ET liaison
programs of the U.S. government.
The functional effect (and some
say the mission) of the SETI program - and of the UN ‘ET’ paradigm - is to
continue the cover-up of the active extraterrestrial presence on Earth,
and of secret human-extraterrestrial liaison programs of he U.S.
government.
This fueling of false expectations by the UN
designation happened already in 2009 with the Obama ‘disclosure is
imminent’ bubble and should not be encouraged again in 2010, as has
happened already by this apparent reporting of a bogus announcement by the
UN on its appointment of an 'extraterrestrial contact' person in Dr.
Othman.
Deactivation of
nuclear weapons 'is a message' to human race
Readers can view the below video (YouTube) of the 'Sept. 27,
2010 nuclear missile UFO whistleblowers' press-conference':
UFOs And Nukes
Exopolitik-NPC Press Conference
September 27, 2010
Robert Salas, Charles Halt, Robert Hastings,
Bruce Fenstermacher, Dwynne Arnesson, Patrick McDonough, Gerome Nelson,
Robert Jamison
give testimony about their UFO encounters
while they were on official duty in the US military.
The 2010 ET
disclosure wave has no such ambiguities in the case of a Sept 27, 2010 press
conference held in Washington DC by U.S. nuclear missile UFO
whistleblowers.
The message of the
intelligent ‘extraterrestrial or interdimensional’ civilizations
intervening to shut down specific nuclear missile facilities
is:
“Deactivation
of nuclear weapons 'is a message' to human race”
The
whistleblowers, all former U.S. servicemen representing more than 100 U.S.
servicemen who have come forward on the issue of have a clear agenda of
putting onto the public record the active intervention of extraterrestrial
or interdimensional intelligent civilizations in matters relating to human
nuclear weaponry.
At the Sept 27, 2010 National Press Club press
conference, former U.S. servicemen,
...disclosed
facts related to interventions by UFOs in U.S. and U.K. nuclear missile
facilities.
According to news reports,
“Capt Robert
Salas, a former missile launch officer, said he was on duty during one
incident at Malmstrom air force base in Montana in 1967.
"An
object came over and hovered directly over the site," he said. "The
missiles shut down. And the same thing happened at another site a week
later. There's a strong interest in our missiles by these objects,
wherever they come from. I personally think they're not from planet
Earth."
News reports from the press
conference also state,
“Suddenly one
of the objects sent a concentrated beam at the feet of the terrified
men.
“'Was this
a warning? An attempt to communicate? A weapon? Then just as suddenly
as it appeared, it disappeared,' he said.
“The entire
incident was categorized as a British affair because it had happened off
base, Mr. Halt said.
“'I have no
idea what we saw that night but I do know it was under intelligent
control. My theory is that it was from another dimension or
extra-terrestrial,' he said.
“The six
former U.S. Air Force officers and one former enlisted man, all
presented declassified information which they claim backs up their
findings.
“They want US and British authorities to release 60
years worth of 'X-Files' they claim proves the existence of
extra-terrestrials.
“And the men said that the UFOs deactivation
of nuclear weapons was a message to the human race to move away from
arms race.”
At the press
conference, Col. Hastings, answering a journalist, stated:
"I don't
think there is a potential hostility [from the intelligent civilization
behind the UFOs], except for the narrow mind
people."
During the
press conference, Col. Hastings also made a very revealing statement with
regard to the impact of the ET disclosure he and his colleagues were
making at this event.
Col. Hastings stated,
"The only
change will be a paradigm shift."
In other words,
Col. Hastings is stating that his hopes that the disclosure his fellow
whistleblowers are making will result in a paradigm shift by the human
race away from nuclear weapons and toward cooperation with other intelligent
civilizations in the multiverse.
La Raza,
Republicans and the Denver ET Affairs Commission ballot
vote
The Denver ET commission
ballot initiative, scheduled for Election Tuesday November 2, 2010, has
recently gained the electoral support of a Key Latino leader whose
organization is responsible for the annual Cinco de Mayo 300,000 person
celebration.
Veronica
Barela, CEO and Executive Director of NEWSED in endorsing Initiative 300,
stated,
“I support
Initiative 300 to create an Extraterrestrial Affairs Commission and I
encourage people to vote yes."
The Denver
Extraterrestrial Affairs Commission appears to be the only current
initiated ordinance proposal on the
Nov. 2, 2010 ballot, as opposed to no charter amendments and only one
recall petition "Petition to Recall Andrea Merida from the Office of
Denver Public School Board District 2"
Therefore Initiative 300 will stand out
on the ballot and not be lost among a forest of other ballot initiatives,
charter amendments and recall petitions at the City of Denver
level.
There are no concrete present indicators as to whether
Initiative 300 will actually pass on Nov. 2, 2010.
The following exchange between
Jeff Peckman, principal proponent of the Denver ET ballot initiative, and an opponent of
Initiative 300 is illustrative of the polarization accompanying many
ballot issues:
Bryan @
2010-09-03 12:42:15
“While
Peckman believes that there is support for the initiative, the City of
Denver might not. Recently Denver District 2 conducted a poll asking if
residents supported a Commission for Extraterrestrial Affairs and the
results were 8% supporting and 92% opposed.”
Jeff Peckman @
2010-09-03 13:27:19
“The Denver
City Council member for District 2 is a Republican. And Republicans
represent LESS than 8% of the Denver City Council. And the District 2
poll was done BEFORE the voter education campaign started. Read very
revealing facts about Democrat and Republican leaders' views and
experiences with UFOs and ETs in the 8-page paper at extracampaign.org.
Then decide your vote.”
How to evaluate the 2010 ET disclosure wave so far
-
Timing
The 2010 ET
disclosure wave is starting to surge in the Fall 2010 (late September,
early October period), the same period as the surge of the 2009 ET
disclosure wave, centered around a purported disclosure by President
Barack Obama that has not yet materialized.
One can
question whether this Fall surge is an ‘after Labor Day’ phenomenon,
or whether there are deeper dimensions driving this
wave.
-
Citizen
disclosure
Of the
three measures so far in the 2010 ET disclosure wave, two involve
substantial citizen-driven extraterrestrial disclosure - the nuclear missile UFO
whistleblowers, and the Denver ET Affairs commission vote.
Citizen-driven disclosure appears to be a key criterion
determining whether a specific ET disclosure effort is directed at
authentic disclosure of an actual extraterrestrial or interdimensional
presence around Earth and of existing human-extraterrestrial liaison
programs of the U.S. government.
-
The SETI
model and the ET Truth embargo
The SETI
model was developed and founded by the late astronomer Carl Sagan (himself
covertly knowledgeable about the UFO/ET presence around Earth) and is
plausibly a sophisticated alternative ‘cover’ to authentic
extraterrestrial and UFO disclosure.
The SETI
paradigm and many of the scientists and infrastructure devoted to SETI
are hostile to the UFO/ET and Exopolitics research paradigm that
states extraterrestrial and interdimensional
civilizations are visiting Earth at this time and have been engaging
some governments such as the U.S. for at least 50 years.
Scientists and spokespersons for the SETI model such as Seth Shostak predominate at the Oct. 4-5,
2010 Royal Society meeting at which Dr Mazlan Othman, director of the
UN Outer Space Office as contact person for extraterrestrial
civilizations is scheduled to speak, apparently on Near Earth
Objects (NEOs) and not on
SETI-type extraterrestrial contacts.
Seth
Shostak, who was featured by 20th Century Fox in a mini-documentary on
‘extraterrestrial contact’ along with this reporter Alfred Lambremont
Webre, is diametrically opposed to disclosure of the extraterrestrial
presence around Earth through the Exopolitics paradigm, and believes
that ‘extraterrestrial disclosure’ will come only through the SETI
paradigm.
-
Authentic ET disclosure vs. the SETI paradigm
Even if the
news report itself were authentic (which as of this writing the UN
itself has denied), the United Nation's very use of a SETI-type
'extraterrestrial contact' paradigm arouses false expectations of
authentic extraterrestrial disclosure being undertaken by the United
Nations.
Similar
false expectations of authentic ET disclosure unfortunately occurred
in exopolitical reporting around the 2009 ET disclosure wave, by
over-interpretation of purported actions within the Obama
administration.
It is important not to repeat the promotion of
false expectations during the 2010 ET disclosure wave by attributing
to the SETI model adopted by the United Nations the same validity as
citizen-driven groups that are attempting to achieve authentic
disclosure of an extraterrestrial presence now on Earth.
The United Nations’ use
of a SETI paradigm that itself understands ‘extraterrestrial contact’
to be contact via radio signals from deep space can be seen as
a functional continuation of the ET truth
embargo.
|