(2238) Thu 12 Nov 92 1:30p Rcvd: Thu 12 Nov 3:27p Cost: 0 By: Uucp, ParaNet(sm) Information Servi (1:104/422) To: Michael Corbin Re: Stringfield St: Pvt Kill Rcvd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ * Original: TO ... Michael Corbin of 1:104/422 * ReDirected Using ReDirect Version 1.00 (C)1989 David Nugent From scicom!csn.org!mcorbin From: mcorbin@csn.org (Michael Corbin) To: scicom!mcorbin Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 12:09:01 -0700 Received: from pucc.Princeton.EDU by csn.org with SMTP id AA10171 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ); Thu, 12 Nov 1992 11:54:02 -0700 Message-Id: <199211121854.AA10171@csn.org> Received: from PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU by pucc.Princeton.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 7190; Thu, 12 Nov 92 13:24:33 EST Received: from PUCC.BITNET by PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU (Mailer R2.09 ptf005) with BSMTP id 4839; Thu, 12 Nov 92 12:24:58 EST Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1992 20:47:18 EST Reply-To: FORUM FOR UFOLOGY Sender: FORUM FOR UFOLOGY From: Charles Mcgrew Subject: From the most recent MUFON journal: Stringfield Article To: Multiple recipients of list UFO-L Status: R These excerpts are from the MUFON UFO JOURNAL No. 294 October 1992. If you want to see the complete article, get the issue of the MUFON Journal (available from MUFON, 103 Oldtowne Rd. Seguin, TX 78155), or to obtain more complete information, send to Mr. Stringfield himself, address at the end. Mr. Stringfield has published a number of excellent small books on UFO "Crash/Retrievals" which I heartily recommend to anyone interested in the subject. Mr. Stringfield has, over the years, cultivated a number of US-governmental/military/intelligence sources, most of which he writes of as anonymous at their own request (that is, he knows who they are, but won't put it in his books.) This may be troubling to some readers, but it would appear to be the only way he can get his information. THE ET CONNECTION by Leonard H. Stringfield Hopefully we are a step closer to breaching the proverbial wall of secrecy by releasing this story, which chronicles an alleged major event that may represent a rewarding breakthrough for mankind's right-to-know. Although details at this time are scant, the two sources responsible for the story are credibly recognized in scientific circles. One, who is acting as intermediary for the prime source, a longtime friend and colleague, is a professor of physics at a major Midwest university. The prime source is a highly educated individual with a strong scientific background, who must remain anonymous for obvious reasons. He chose to take his friend into his confidence to relate that he had at an unspecified time a one-on-one, face-to-face meeting with a live extraterrestrial entity under prearranged conditions. As recorded in my book, The Inner Sanctum, Status Report VI (published September 1991), contact with my source began with the investigation of a UFO crash/retrieval incident, which gave us the opportunity to work closely for many months, building a lasting mutual trust in our research endeavors. This relationship was exemplified in March of 1990, when my friend called to alert me that sensitive information would follow by mail. His edited letter stated in part: Dear Len: Here are the details of my friend's experience with a live EBE in the Seventies. I thought it best if I didn't say anything over the phone about my writing this letter. First of all, I trust this individual about as much as one can trust anyone, to the extent that if he is Iying to me, I really don't know who I can believe. He was asked by officials (either government or military, I don't know which) to meet with the extraterrestrial in order to attempt to communicate telepathically with it. I asked him where they keep it, and he gave me a vague answer that did tell me where. He also said that the military had devised some kind of electrostatic barrier for study of the limits of signal ranges at a specified location where dialogue took place. He told me an interesting thing about the crystal communicator that the EBE had there. He didn't see it himself, but spoke to someone who had seen it. Apparently each event that happens leaves behind some kind of biogravity trace, like the infrared trace we might leave for a few days if we walk across a field. According to information given to my friend, this crystal device distinguishes between biomagnetic and bio-gravitational signals in the human brain's own crystallinefield and can sort out bio-gravity traces from the past and can coordinate traces from specific events and show them in the crystal. Well, Len, that's about it. If you have any questions about any of this, I will be glad to try to answer them. I think I have told you all of the details I know; but if I think of anything else I'll let you know. As we discussed previously, please don't mention these details to anyone. In late 1990 and early 1991, following this disclosure, other credible sources were also sharing bits and pieces of sensitive information, some of it dealing with UFO crash/retrievals, suspected government interaction in abduction cases, a hostile confrontation in a war zone and military aircraft encounters, et cetera. As a result, I wrote The Inner Sanctum, in which I included this terse reference on page 126: "... two sources tell of scientific and/or military contact with a live alien. One, who was more specific, is a physicist, whose friend, also a scientist, was assigned to interrogate a live entity in isolation under rigid control conditions. The details entrusted to me are, by request, not publishable at this time." Further sensitized by the influx of new information from deep-throat sources, I speculated in the Prologue of my book that some of it may have been initiated from inside the wall of secrecy, either as part of a master plan to spoon-feed the public, or, because of a sudden dire urgency. My friend's source gave no hint as to his role, but I learned later that he evinced some personal concerns. In January 1992 my friend and his source met again. Because I had received information from firsthand medical sources in the late 1970s about the ET's physiological features, he asked before the meeting that I submit a list of pertinent questions to ask his contact. My friend's letter of January 18, with significant parallelisms, follows, in part: The extraterrestrial was insectoid in appearance, and stood about four feet tall. It has large, black, penetrating, wrap-around eyes that were both powerful and riveting. They seemed to be 30-40 times stronger than ours, so it could see well at night, and in dark environments. Its nose and mouth were insignificant. Its arms were long with respect to its body, and its hands had four fingers, two of which seemed longer than the others. My contact could not determine its sex. It had some kind of head covering on (not a helmet), and also wore clothing; but my contact hardly noticed, since its face was so powerful and riveting. He doesn't know if it had a beltline system on. It didn't gesture or move (I think I remember this correctly). My contact did not notice any eye movement or blinking. It was too dark to tell if the skin was reptilian. It was cooperative, not hostile. The room was dimly lit, with modest furniture and a single window. My contact was seated, and it was standing. There was no one else in the room, but my contact thought he was probably being watched, possibly through electronic or paranormal surveillance. My contact would not say how he was brought in, and would not say when their meeting occurred. He would only say that he has been cooperating with the government since 1973. The extraterrestrial was not captured, and there was no intercept mission. Rather, it was part of an exchange program. My contact would not say when the exchange took place. Their ship (and others) operates out of both east and west coast areas, which accounts for the confusion among UFO researchers. My contact said that we benefitedfar more from the exchange program (with the higher or ethical ETs) than they did. Dialogue with the ET was normally behind some kind of electrostatic barrier, but the barrier and locks were useless, since it could free itself any time it wanted to. It chose to stay where we wanted it. Their mission here is scientific, not hostile. My contact communicated with it telepathically for roughly 35 minutes about various topics in astronomy and astrophysics. He wouldn't tell me what they told each other mentally, except that it said that it came from a star system so far away that it wasn't worth giving the location. It was not from the Zeta Reticuli star system -- much farther away. My contact said that there are four different kinds of greys. He had the impression that this one seemed to take energy from the surroundings rather than through eating or absorption by photosynthesis. There are lower (unethical) and higher (ethical) ETs involved with genetic experimentation. We are in trouble because most experts cannot discern the intent of the lower ETs from the higher ETs who respect human freedom. All governments in the world originally kept everything quiet, until they could find out what was going on. Then, as more information was gotten and an agreement with the aliens was made, it became harder to release the information. There could be a massive public outcry when this is exposed, forcing resignations on a grand scale -- governmental, military, etc. New people will be needed to come forth with new ideas. My contact said that the meeting was a powerful, riveting experlence. Comments: Persistent rumors, since the late 1960s tell of ET contact and/or clandestine connection with officialdom. Stories cover a wide spectrum: cooperative treaties for peaceful universal coexistence or, on a grimmer note, the takeover of underground bases and a broken treaty, hostile skirmishes, exchange of abduction rights for technology, animal and human mutilations, ad infinitum. If any of these scenarios are true, except for the Utopian prospects for peaceful universal coexistence, then one need not expect an official admission -- especially if a superior race is dictating the terms. According to my friend's source, the ET he met as a representative of one race of greys is here for non-hostile scientific purposes. Why, then, has officialdom not shared this bit of seeming harmony with humanity? Why maximum secrecy? But to appraise or put into perspective the far-reaching implications of an alleged human-extraterrestrial exchange program, we need more definitive and updated information. If, as my source avers, we are visited by more than one extraterrestrial race, each possibly with a different agenda, we are left only to ponder the intents of those not agreeing to formal contact or an exchange program. What for example, is the purpose of abductions, a violation of human rights? What, if true, is the meaning behind the claims of genetic manipulation or fetus snatching? Perhaps such a practice, employed by one or all of the greys, can be objectively explained as scientific, ethical or non-hostile. But for now, there are too many gray areas overall, which may involve a hidden and more sinister agenda. My friend's story, with the illustrious credentials of his source, is extraordinary. For both to surface, despite anonymity, is an example of courage when I consider they are not in lock step with the mainstream of scientific rationale. It may also prove difficult for the myopic media to put the story into reportorial perspective, especially when the mindset of the average citizen is mainly concerned with traditional mundane affairs. I have every reason to believe the word of my physicist friend, just as I have believed my medical informants who provided firsthand information to me about the alien anatomy. When I questioned my friend about his source's veracity or whether he may be playing the disinformation game, he replied, as an analogy, that he had always believed his mother and was quick to put his colleague in the same entrusting category. Mr. Stringfield can be reached at: 4412 Grove Avenue Cincinnati, Ohio 45227 USA If anyone wants a price-list for his books, please let me know.