Memorandum for the Record on EVOs
"EVO" = Exotic
Vacuum Object"
Ken Shoulder seems to be making them on the
mesoscopic scale.
All leptoquarks are also
spatiallyextended EVOs on the fermi scale 10^13 cm in their rest
frames, that shrink from spatial warping to ~ 10^16 cm when probed
with highenergy impact parameters, are Bohm hidden variables, i.e.
Wheeler's "IT".
The Galactic Halo holding the stars together
in our galaxy is a large EVO.
Flying saucers weightless warp
drive is EVO advanced super technology.
That is, UFO
"GEngines" (George Trimble in Nick Cook's "The Hunt for Zero
Point") making Paul Hill's "acceleration fields" are EVO
engines.
On possibly "cold fusion" application of EVOs see p.
77 of August 2004 "Popular Mechanics".
On Aug 24, 2004, at
7:08 PM, Ken Shoulders wrote:
Jack I have put some thoughts on the web and
enclosed a copy for your inspection. Please let me know if I am
way off or have said something already well known. In addition,
see if you can find any of your dark stuff sticking to electrons
that might cause the short range attraction without harming the
long range repulsion so revered by
all.
That's exactly what my equations
show! :)
I will get back to your write up in a few days.
:)
Briefly the argument goes like this:
The Coulomb
electric repulsive self energy per electron for an N electron EVO
charge cluster of radius r* is
~ N^2e^2/mr*
Imagine
all N electrons distributed uniformly in a thin spherical shell,
Think of each electron Bohm hidden variable as a sphere of radius ~
h/mc. Therefore, N spheres close packed have an area A ~ N(h/mc)^2.
The Schwarzschild curvature radius r* is defined as
A =
4pir*^2
Therefore, ignoring rotation of the sphere and
IGNORING the QED Casimir force (stick them in later), keeping only
the zero point energy induced effective gravity from Einstein's
exotic vacuum field equation
Guv + /\zpfguv = 0
in
this crude toy model (BTW Hal Puthoff does not understand this last
equation. You will never find it in any of his papers related to
"metric engineering" yet it is the fundamental equation for metric
engineering!) ignoring small rational fractions of pi for this back
of the envelope estimate:
N(h/mc)^2 ~ r*^2 for close
packing
For a uniform spherical core of exotic vacuum /\zpf
holding the N electrons together in the spherical shell, the gravity
selfenergy per unit electron is simply
~
c^2/\zpfr*^2
Note that this is a 3D harmonic oscillator
potential! It has a natural symmetry group SU(3) as I recall? Also
like the quark potential the energy increases with
separation!
Why is it a 3D harmonic oscillator potential?
Simple, drill a hole through the center of the Earth and drop a
ball. I am using Newton's law of gravity that the mass beyond the
position of the ball does not influence its motion. With rotation
there will be frame drag gravimagnetism of course that is missing in
Hal's PV model.
For dynamical equilibrium you need to have
the negative gradients of all the potential energies add up to zero.
Worry about stability later.
Therefore the equilibrium
is
N^2e^2/mc^2r*^2  2/\zpfr* =
0
or
N(e^2/mc^2)(mc/h)^2 =
2/\zpfN^1/2(h/mc)
/\zpf ~ N^1/2(e^2/mc^2)(mc/h)^2 ~
N^1/2(137)(mc/h)^2
Note that if N ~ 10^11
r* ~ 10^5
10^11 ~ 10^6 cm ~ 10 nanometers
on this model that ignores
rotation and Casimir force as a first approximation.
Note
that /\zpf scales only as the square root of the total number N of
electrons in the charge cluster EVO ignoring rotation of the EVO
about its center of mass and also ignoring the QED Casimir
force.
Note that you need an antigravity repulsive core
/\zpf of positive zero point energy density with negative quantum
pressure to hold your EVO together because the electric repulsion
energy is positive but decreases with increasing distance. The zero
point energy induced strong gravity of the exotic vacuum core needs
to be positive because it then increases with separation to make a
minimum well of stability in the total potential energy! So that
this is actually a "dark energy core" of the EVO! Just what the
doctor ordered for cold fusion BTW! :)
Note further that
dark energy makes Hal Puthoff PV parameter K < 1 in his simplest
SSS model. Not that I think Puthoff's PV model is any good of
course, but at least it is testable and has that feature that Hal
was looking for.
Appendix on Hal Puthoff's PV
Model
On Aug 24, 2004, at 5:44 PM, Jack Sarfatti
wrote:
PS Let me for the record explicitly address
Hal's
Wrong again. Proper control of K in the
PV model IS control of vacuum coherence, just like ZPE mode
suppression between Casimir plates IS control of interference
patterns by boundary conditions. You've never gotten
this, have you? (Others have.) Wake up and smell
the chai!
There Hal
goes again dragging in the dead cat of the QED Casimir force,
which has nothing to do with the direct gravity effect of zero
point energy. Hal seems to equate
"ZPE mode suppression"
with "vacuum coherence".
This is not what I mean by "vacuum
coherence".
First of all, Hal is only thinking of random
virtual photons trapped between two plates. I am thinking of a
"More is different" local complex order parameter from a vacuum
condensate of virtual electronpositron pairs.
How does Hal
propose to get warp drives and wormholes from the tiny Casimir
force between two plates?
The direct gravity effect of zero
point energy has nothing at all to do with the Casimir force, nor
do you need plates particularly. It has to do with the Einstein
field equation for the exotic vacuum that is
Guv + /\zpfguv
= 0
In any case I challenge Hal to make some simple
mathematical models of what he means by
"just like ZPE mode
suppression between Casimir plates IS control of interference
patterns by boundary conditions"
And how that helps in the
quest to metric engineer warp drives and traversable wormhole time
travel star gates?
On Aug 24, 2004, at 5:30 PM, Jack
Sarfatti wrote:
1.1 Do a comparative analysis of the CERN
document
http://correo.hispavista.com/Redirect/cdsweb.cern.ch/search.py?recid=789638&ln=en
and
the NIDS documents
http://correo.hispavista.com/Redirect/www.nidsci.org/pdf/vallee_davis.pdf
http://correo.hispavista.com/Redirect/www.nidsci.org/pdf/vallee_davis_ppt.pdf
Point
out strengths and weaknesses in each.
1.2 What is wrong
and or right with Hal Puthoff's statement:
On Aug 24,
2004, at 3:38 PM, Puthoff@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 8/24/2004 4:44:47 PM
Central Daylight Time, sarfatti@pacbell.net writes: Metric
engineering is the control of the phase of the vacuum
coherence. Puthoff, Davis, Haisch, Vallee and all the
Boys at NIDS, NASA BPP, MITRE, BAE etal have not the
slightest inkling of what this is.
Wrong again. Proper control of K in the
PV model IS control of vacuum coherence, just like ZPE mode
suppression between Casimir plates IS control of interference
patterns by boundary conditions. You've never gotten
this, have you? (Others have.) Wake up and smell
the chai! You can continue to say the
above as often as you like, but, unlike Picard, it does
not make it so!
:) Hal
What does Hal
mean by "K"?
In his simplest charge neutral SSS
model
K = e^2GM/c^2r
Where does the "vacuum
coherence" appear in Hal's formula?
What is Hal Puthoff's
definition of "vacuum coherence"?
Hint: He has yet to
publish one.
Assuming Hal comes up with a definition of
"vacuum coherence" precise enough to compare with his "K", are
we talking about the same idea?
Where does the term
"vacuum coherence" appear in any of Hal's papers? Ditto for the
recent paper by Vallee and Davis.
Where does the term
"dark energy"appear in any of Hal's papers? Ditto for the recent
paper by Vallee and Davis.
Where and when does Hal
discuss the relationships among "dark energy", "K" and "vacuum
coherence"?
Where does Hal give a practical procedure, in
principle as a gedankexperiment at least, for how to control K
significantly and how to make K < 1?
Jack Sarfatti's
solution to problem 1.2 for the historical record.
For
the record. Here is my ORIGINAL formula for the above problem
using Hal's PV model that is not found in any of his papers. For
a uniform exotic vacuum distribution of positive zero point
pressure, i.e. a uniform sphere of "dark matter" of radius r*
like the Galactic Halo, assuming Hal's wrong PV model,
then
GM is replaced by c^2/\zpfr*^3 neglecting small
rational factors of pi
In the conventions used exotic
vacuum /\zpf < 0 gravitates as "dark matter" and /\zpf > 0
antigravitates as "dark energy".
Therefore, at least for
r > r*
K = e^2/\zpfr*^3/r
Note that K > 1
for /\zpf < 0, i.e. for gravitating "dark matter" attractive
phase of exotic vacuum.
K < 1 for /\zpf > 0, i.e.
for antigravitating "dark energy" repulsive phase of exotic
vacuum.
Furthermore
/\zpf = (Quantum of
Area)^1[(Quantum of Volume)Vacuum Coherence^2 
1]
Where "Vacuum Coherence" is a LOCAL complex scalar
field that derives primarily from a virtual electronpositron
pair condensate whose phase gives Einstein's metric field
guv.
