last review 31 August 2008
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009
Subject: Freedom and Free Will are excellent natural
rights of mankind, and the awakening of Consciousness is a priority
and essential to our Evolution in the Universe
This is at the
heart of both our enjoyment and our repression, because there will
always be a force that is determined that the masses don't deserve
it. What they don't understand is that without these, we cannot
survive as a race. And with these we will always struggle to achieve
freedom and free will, because of the great responsibility that
comes with both. It is hard work.
I have been struggling to
understand what those who are here in our skies are really up to.
They do not make it easy to understand. Add to that the denial
humans pile on top both within the masses and the governments or
power structures and you have a very difficult problem to
understand. I know this much with certainty, they are intimately
responding to our political/military strategy and implementation.
Whether this is for our benefit, benign or their favor only is yet
The messengers that say they are in
contact with them also say they are here for our benefit. I am not
so sure that it is wise to take that at face value without
confirmation. If we were going to another planet, is that the way we
would allow ourselves to be known? Through coercive manipulation of
the militaries, crop circles and projecting our intent through
messengers? Wouldn't it make more sense to work through the
political and policy structure of that planet? Otherwise, how would
it have any validity?
Don't we have a validity problem with
Our global higher institutions do not recognize it as a
valid issue. Global policy makers may have it on their agenda, but
it will be related to global security or global sovereignty. The
political structure is quiet on the real issues they are certainly
aware of after 65 years of intense activity and study. Sure they
release files from time to time in different countries, but it is
like throwing scraps to the dogs.
They eat it up and are distracted and
satiated. But the real disturbing and important findings are being
held under strict classification. At the same time I am not
convinced that the bright minds within these circles have it figured
out - because they are being thrown scraps as well - by those who
are here in our skies. It is a low level stand-off, a dilemma. But
to everyone involved including the masses, it is not truly
"official" and openly recognized or dealt with.
Do you think
that someone who approaches us (our race) in this manor can truly be
Do you think this is a wise approach?
all for enlightenment. It is our gift that we can be enlightened,
but it is also our responsibility as to how we achieve that
individually and as a race. So far our record overall is not that
good. But there are many pockets of hope, and this is what keeps up
moving forward. I don't think we were meant to have outside help on
enlightenment other than that creator (whoever that is). It is our
responsibility. It is our will. this is why we have free will - to
achieve those things individually and together.
important issue is that our religious institutions do not officially
recognize the visitors. Now that could be because of the structure,
the dogma, the leadership will not allow it. And that could apply to
our higher institutions and our governments. Is it bad to hesitate
as they seem to be doing? Or is it wise to wait for the appropriate
approach/contact and in the meantime, be extremely skeptical and
If you were in charge, would you throw open your
arms to the visitors after hearing the messengers of the
I think there is plenty of evidence that indicates
that we should be extremely cautious.
Our nuclear weapons
infrastructure has been thoroughly surveyed and at certain specific
times relating to policy, tampered with. Other aspects of our
weapons infrastructure have been tampered with and we have been
clearly shown the superiority involved.
Do we just ignore
that and open our arms?
There is no clear answer here. Not
yet. In the meantime, I don't think we can look to our political
leadership for answers, nor do I think they should be less than
Maybe the visitors are here for our benefit. Maybe
their way of getting themselves known is one that has merit. I still
think caution is warranted by our governments.
Until we know
- you and I - we should be cautious too.
UFO respond to our political will in the arena of nuclear weapons?
is inevitable to compare the onset of prolific UFO activity of the last 60
or so years to our acquiring nuclear weapons capability. In making
that comparison it is essential to realize the possibility that an
historical relationship could exist, and to at least perform a study to
make that determination. This paper’s primary goal is the introduction of
the historical correlative concept and represents a small sample of such a
paper also provides topic organizational structure allowing the data to be
collected in a fashion that is easily applied to historical research.
Although much progress has been made towards firming this approach, not
all topics have received correlative attention as of this writing.
Why choose military sighting data?
significance of military sightings is imbedded in the high quality of the
observation and documentation, the consistency of the types of activity,
and most important, the notice taken by the chain of command. Engaging the
military of a state is the most direct way of getting attention – all the
way to the top.
is apparent that direct contact with leaders of states today is rare or
probably nonexistent. Any sighting at or near to a state’s capital should
therefore be treated as extremely significant. Most normal UFO activity
occurs in fashions not meant to attract attention, such as in the guise of
night or in remote areas, or so brief in length as to make it nearly
impossible to ascertain anything from the sighting.
discovered, UFO usually end any observation by leaving quickly. Yet
military engagement is direct, specific in type and location, often having
duration indicating the intent to acquire full attention.
Repetition of specific activities related to military could very
well be attempts to relate or demonstrate clear superiority, concern over
policy/decisions, and, with the more aggressive activity, a conveyance of
warnings. That cannot be ignored as a distinct possibility. This is the
case with UFO activity related directly to nuclear technology, weaponry
and the associated political prowess.
What does this have to do
with a possible historical relationship?
Evidence supports this relationship. The location and the timing of
many of these sightings are coincident with historical events within the
related realm, whether that is conventional conflict or specific aspects
of nuclear policy and militarization. This does not apply just to the US.
There is much to be learned by applying an orderly study of this
relationship both in conventional military conflict and nuclear
Introducing this historical relational
concept in a convincing manner to the general populace would require a
fairly extensive set of consistent examples. When looking at the complex
history of the last 60 years, the task becomes daunting.
However, setting specific categories and building examples for each
with consideration of pertinent global military actions helps simplify
this significantly. The separation between “conventional” and “nuclear”
strategy/decisions during the various conflicts must be maintained at all
times. The “conventional” military actions have related UFO activities
which likely carry with them an agenda differing from that of “nuclear”
related UFO activities.
While the results from each category may
not stand firm statistically, applied together the composition with their
patterns of behavior become more revealing. Over time a sense is acquired
of the types of nuclear related policies/decisions/events and the
kinds/timing of UFO activity these elicit.
Loren Gross has
written about the Berlin crisis of 1948 in an historical relational manner
(NCP-01: Some Early Patterns). There
are many more nuclear historical manifestations to draw from. Although we
lay claim to being the first to detonate atomic weapons, the events that
we are studying here in the US are not peculiar to the US - Britain,
France, the former Soviet Union (and now, Russia), China, Israel,
Pakistan, India, and probably South Africa, all likely have had similar
types of activity.
focus of this study has only included the first five. Of those, China and
France have yielded little information thus far. Actions of UFO related to
nuclear technology and its utilization border on predictable.
following list represents known categories for UFO event/nuclear
historical correlative study:
Weapons Development and Manufacture – Atomic and thermonuclear - research facilities
(Los Alamos, Sandia Labs, Lawrence Livermore) and other developmental
This category seems straight-forward in that sightings
at these locations could be related to activity at these facilities at
the time of the sighting. It could even be as simple as status checks
or demonstrating concern through repeated presence at facilities.
More study is needed in this category to determine if any
historical significance exists in these incursions.
Processing Facilities (initially
Oak Ridge Tennessee then Hanford Washington -in my backyard).
Hanford was the second facility built to support the Manhattan
Project. The fuel for the weapons used in Japan came from this
facility. It would be an obvious target for surveillance and
An event occurred at this facility on or around the date of the
Radar picked up a fast moving oval object the size of three
aircraft carriers side by side which then began to hover over
N-Plant at 65,000 ft altitude. Six F6F's were scrambled to the
object but reached a maximum altitude of 42,000 ft, 5,000 ft above
the rated ceiling of the F6F.
The pilots were forced to go back as their engines began to
fail and fuel became dangerously low. The object then disappeared as
quickly as it came. At least twenty minutes elapsed during the
event. The object was described as "very streamlined like a
stretched-out egg and pinkish in color" and emitting vapor from the
The date of the occurrence was described by Rolan Powell, one
of the pilots, as "six weeks before the Japanese surrendered aboard
the Battleship Missouri in Tokyo Bay on September 2, 1945.” This
places the sighting in the middle of July.
Living On The Edge: An American war hero's daring feats
as a navy fighter pilot, civilian test pilot, and CIA mercenary by
Byron D. Varner, privately published. Also interviews with the
author and principal, Rolan D. Powell by Walt Andrus.
Thanks to Francis Ridge
NICAP Web Site
Long duration sightings at or near these facilities close to
such important dates can interpreted as demonstrations. The timing of
these demonstrations often occur about significant atomic/nuclear
related events. Do they want our leaders to be cognizant of these
incursions and their importance? It is as if they are applying
The sighting over the Oak Ridge facility September 18 of 1944
occurred on the same day as the Hyde Park Accord, a secret accord
between the US and Britain [F. D. Roosevelt and W. Churchill] deciding
atomic bombing of Japan. There are many events that have occurred over
the weapons material manufacturing facilities and much opportunity to
learn the historical significance.
In a search for information relating UFO to Hanford,
documents relating to the cleanup efforts at Hanford turned up with
information on a waste dump area officially titled “UFO Landing Area.”
It is in one of the oldest dump areas of the reservation and adjacent
to the main security facilities.
It appears, based on another person’s
review of recent aerial photos, that the cleanup is complete at that
That was an interesting find. The titles
of these various cleanup areas do not show a theme of humor or
sarcasm. The underground plume of contaminants at the reservation is
slowly working its way toward the Columbia River.
At this time, there is not much we can do
to halt this progression.
Weapons Testing – have test dates and
locations, Space Tests-EMP Moon
N-test? (US, Britain, France and Russia)
It is likely that
appearances were made at a majority of the tests. There is film
footage from the DoD that looks suspiciously like a UFO applying
surveillance during a test. Many of these tests are available on
Some of these tests were demonstrations themselves for the
sake of applying pressure to the former USSR. These would be likely
candidates for demonstration activity from the UFO.
in particular that either was or wasn’t attempted, was a demonstration
test that was slated to occur on the Moon. There are two accounts –
one that says the Air Force shut the project down and another that
says it was launched, intercepted and destroyed by UFO.
actually take place in space, however, in 1958 and again in 1962 after
the test moratorium was over.
These were executed to realize the results of ionizing the Van Allen belt with radiation. As it turned
out in a test from Johnston Island, radar, radio communications and
power were all knocked out in a large area. This EMP
(electro-magnetic pulse) affect is known to be a useful tool in
knocking out the enemies’ ability to retaliate. The possibility of an
enemy’s use of EMP has become an important driver in having missile
Another attempted test on Johnston
resulted in destruction of the rocket on the pad and resulting
plutonium contamination of a large area around the launch facility.
Deaths have been attributed to exposure following the accident.
Its unimaginable that we would have continued to get away with
sending these weapons into space. Between the US and the USSR there
were at least 20 tests. These were cut off due to the danger posed to
space assets, astronauts and
cosmonauts, and the population as a whole (not to mention UFO).
An Outer Space Treaty was drawn up in response to keep
nuclear weapons out of space for detonation or targeting from space.
There is a good video (below) called “Nukes in Space” (Peter Kuran)
and more information on the space tests available on the Internet.
Nukes In Space
Delivery of fissile materials via naval vessel for these
tests had UFO fly-overs. It is also likely the USS Indianapolis and its
ill-fated mission delivering the fissile material unescorted for the
Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings had visits by UFO.
There are survivors from that sinking, but It seems unjustifiable
interviewing them about possible sightings during their voyage after
hearing their personal accounts of the hell they lived through.
Rocket/Missile Development (White Sands, Australia, Russia).
It would be consistent
for UFO to monitor rocket development both as future delivery vehicles
for nuclear weapons and for our space purposes.
Accounts exist to support this observation. Further work is
needed to provide examples.
Nuclear Threat or Standoff Conditions - dates of US decisions or military command
recommendations to pursue the use of nuclear weapons during various
conflicts and standoffs.
It is this category that would
include incursions over Washington D.C. and other capitals throughout
the world. There are many examples to draw from. The demonstrations in
these instances would be more bold, pointed at leadership and
persistent in duration. The 1952 flap holds many secrets.
At that time we were in the midst of the Korean war, were on
schedule with development of the hydrogen bomb, had many complex
issues to consider regarding the Soviets with their nuclear weapons
development and China. China’s involvement in the Korean War had
pushed our military command towards recommending the use of atomic
weapons at least once.
This instance had taken place in the first months of 1951. In
1952 we had new developments involving China over the situation in the
Indo-China region. China was once again aiding in a growing conflict
that would eventually oust the French colonial government and persist
to become the Vietnam War.
An article researched and printed in a prominent Japanese
newspaper Asahi on September 16, 1984, states that according to
documents retrieved through the FOIA, on July 16, 1952, the joint
chiefs made the recommendation to take on China utilizing atomic
Excerpts from the article as translated to English:
“The United States Department of State announced on the 14th
[September, 1984] that in its diplomatic documents, the United
States Armed Forces were concerned with the French gradually losing
in its frontline battle in the Indo-China War. The United States was
contemplating cutting resources to the League for Vietnamese
independence (The Vietnamese army led by Ho Chi Minh), and to
use nuclear weapons against China to prevent their descending south.
It is known from the diplomatic documents released last year
, that nuclear weapons considered for use against China by the
United States when entering the Korean War. But this is the first
time that the consideration for the use of nuclear weapons in the
first Indo-China war was made public.
According to those
documents, the first time that a nuclear strike against China was
considered, was on January 11, 1952 at the conference held by
military representatives from the United States, France, and
England, Chairman Bradley of the Joint Chiefs of Staffs. He
suggested that, in order to halt the southern advance of China in
the Indo-China war, they warn China about the use of nuclear weapons
as being one of their options. But, telling the method that they
would use in a retaliatory attack was considered unwise, and the
suggestion was dropped.
In the same year, on July 16, at the
strategic military conference held by the Department of State and
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Chairman Bradley stated that it would be
difficult to halt the southern advance of China without paralyzing
their transportation systems with nuclear weapons.
It is not known at this time what the view of President
Truman was concerning this topic.”
There is evidence to support that strong connections exist
between political/military considerations of the use of nuclear
weapons and the appearance of UFO at the capitol or other important
Of the conflicts since WWII, the Vietnam War has provided the
largest number of nuclear scenarios beginning in 1949, when the
Chinese began supplying arms to Ho Chi Minh.
Certainly all of the nuclear threats and standoffs have to be
studied to look for consistent patterns before passing judgment on the
1952 D.C. correlation indicated above.
Deployment of Nuclear Bomber and Missile
Wings - US and overseas, increased
activity as a result of. (over bombers on alert status, weapons
storage, harassing bombers on training missions, etc…) (most US
locations were bases left over from WWII).
historical documents for the US and overseas are being utilized.
Although this category is not documented yet, many examples have been
collected over the years to suggest that correlation of activity with
deployment is a sure thing. This will be backed with data as this
The primary purpose of covering this topic is to indicate a
strong statistical relationship. If UFO are truly interested in and
concerned over our nuclear components as the evidence supports, this
would in itself be the motivation for the different incursions over
these bases. Monitoring weapon types, movement and deployment would
surely be the activities they would engaged in. Another aspect this
topic uncovers is the treatment generally of our military planes.
UFO tend to engage our military aircraft directly and boldly.
Nuclear False Alerts -
bomber fleet attacks or missile launches indicated by early warning
radar installations or satellites-occurring in the US or USSR (with
consideration of specific nuclear related action or deployment by a
country, increasing political tensions).
This is one hot
topic. Of course there have been many false alerts that were of our
own accord, whether equipment malfunction, inadequate equipment
design, or technology infancy. Then there are some that probably fall
completely out of our hands, and its interesting to note what was
going on when these occurred. As an example, in the mid 1970’s,
European NATO countries were reformulating defense policy.
It made little sense to have large numbers of ground troops in
the face of a nuclear threat from the USSR. What really made sense
both economically and strategically, was to have Eastern Europe
defended by a theater of medium range nuclear tipped missiles. The
only problem was that the location of the missiles only gave Moscow
six minutes response time. Comparing that with what the US had left a
Deployment of the Pershing II missiles began in the early
eighties. Many articles about false alerts during this period indicate
the number of false alerts through 1985 is surely in the thousands.
This is difficult to verify. Equally difficult to verify is the source
of these alerts. There are the same few explanations repeated over and
over. While this accounts for a few, what of the rest?
The true depth of the issue of false nuclear alerts is not
explored or exposed for reasons likely having to do with public
confidence. If UFO have had a role in keeping our defense apparatus
off balance with these staged scenarios, who in the defense department
would ever admit this?
Going back to December of 1950, about a
year after Russia had detonated its first atomic bomb, we had an alert
that looked like Russian bombers headed towards our Northeastern
coast. This was probably our first alert. The bombers faded out on the
radar screens before any detrimental action was taken. Its interesting
to note that a year after the first detonation would have provided the
Russians enough time to assemble the weapons and to get the bombers
ready for the task.
This is a difficult topic to get good data
on. But it would be consistent that UFO would engage the US and the
Soviets in such a fashion.
If anyone reading this is aware of examples, please pass them
Missile Wing Interference (nondestructive and limited scope demonstrations/warnings) -
with missile launch readiness or missile trajectory change, or with
test launches curtailing dummy warhead trajectory, all demonstrating
highly advanced capability we are unable to anticipate and design to.
(Both US and USSR. What else do they have up their sleeve?)
At some point we passed the line separating the possibility
and the probability of utilizing ICBM weapons. This is a discussion
worth engaging in because it will likely reveal that military and
political will somehow changed in the early 1960’s to elicit the bold
UFO activity experienced at the various missile bases.
It is no secret to most individuals who have read the various
publications discussing military related UFO activity that launch
capability of limited numbers of missiles were taken offline on a few
occasions, and that launch coordinates were altered at least once.
There was also a test launch of an Atlas ICBM with a dummy
warhead out over the Pacific in September of 1964 (Deliberate Deception: The Big Sur UFO
Filming – Bob Jacobs). This test was filmed and, upon
review of the film, officials in the airforce found a disk entering
into the frames, circling the warhead, shooting a laser like beam at
four separate locations on the warhead, and exiting the frames.
The dummy warhead then tumbled out of its trajectory. There are
many other instances including an individual silo in Russia where the
controls indicated to the operator for a harrowing 15 seconds that the
launch sequence was initiated and the missile was about to launch. A
massive UFO hovered outside of the silo control facility.
The top officials were aware of this event. Why did these kinds
of activity occur? One assessment is that we were being shown a
superior capability. For what purpose?
Here are some possible reasons:
Indicating to our military command that we do not have the
control over these assets that would have to be in place in order to
Allowing that we may not know whether our equipment is
malfunctioning or that the source is external.
Allowing that in a real scenario, we will not have certainty
that interference wouldn’t occur again.
Uncertainty seems to play an important role. With thousands of
nuclear weapons ready to go at any time and with the predictions of
the outcome uncertainty has no place. No permanent damage was incurred
by these activities and our national security was minimally
The people at the top were well aware of these events.
Nuclear Military Exercises (US and joint)
This is another category that is worth
filling in with some research. If pressure was being applied using
these other areas for demonstration, likely nuclear exercises would
have had them as well.
(research, reactor, weapons test, weapons lost, vessels sunk).
There was one purported incident in Canada where a small
nuclear-tipped cruise missile was fired from a US military aircraft at
a UFO, missing it, of course. Although that may not be considered an
accident, it is not stated whether the missile was recovered after the
There were many occasions when bombs were lost,
nuclear submarines loaded with missiles sank, and accidents occurred
at nuclear fuel processing plants and nuclear power plants. A limited
search for activity at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania turned up
dry. There may have been some related activity after the event. It
will take more work.
Chernobyl was a different case. UFO
Activity occurred prior to and after the accident there.
Readings before and after a sphere descended over the facility
just after the accident indicated that the level in that area had been
reduced by over 2/3, according to Paul Stonehill in “The Soviet UFO Files”.
Mining Raw Uranium –
what better place to make a statement than the mines.
documented activity over uranium mines in Africa. It is likely that
data will support mine-related sightings in Wyoming.
And here’s a fascinating event that occurred in Texas:
The summer of 1971, I was working the night shift for Conoco
Oil Co. at an open pit uranium mine west of Karnes City, Tx. I was
one of 6 people operating Caterpillar 657B earth movers. We were
down to about 210 feet deep when this incident happened. It was
about 11:10 PM , just after shift change we were getting ready to
crank our machines, when the 85 acre pit lit up as if it was
daylight. The light was so bright that I had to squint because it
hurt my eyes.
I remember hearing a high pitched hissing noise and the hair
on my arms stood on end. I was so scared, I fell to the ground and
started praying. I remember trying to look up, but the light was so
bright I couldn't. After about 2 minutes, the light started getting
dimmer and I could finally look up at it. What I saw amazed me.
The object was round and the bright light was coming from the
center of the bottom of the UFO. Around the perimeter of the craft
was hundreds of penlight size light beams that alternated in all
colors of the spectrum. Now I know they were laser beams. The UFO
was rising up slowly at first and then went straight up out of sight
in about 10 seconds.
I was crying and shaking and so was everyone else. The other
shift workers thought we were crazy when we told them what had
happened. But we got the last laugh. This is how we proved it
actually happened. There is a vein of uranium ore that runs from
George West Texas to almost Texarkana Texas.
When determining where to place a mine, the following steps
A geologist with a geiger counter flies over the area and
finds the highest radiation reading.
Drilling trucks are sent out and core samples are drilled
to determine the highest concentration of uranium ore. These core
samples are drilled in a grid pattern and every core sample is
given a tracking number and logged in showing the concentration
and amount of uranium present.
The open pit mine is then laid out according to these core
samples. When this UFO incident happened, we were about 2 feet
away from a layer of hard rock called the "tap rock" that laid
directly on top of the uranium ore. The uranium ore varied in
depth from 6 to 18 inches and had about the same brown color as
low grade coal.
Two days after this incident, the tap rock was removed to
expose the uranium ore. We were astounded to find that the uranium
ore was now a chalky white substance that had NO
radioactivity at all!
There was a 250 foot diameter circle of this chalky material
in the center of the pit. Outside of the circle, the uranium ore was
still as potent as before the incident. Core samples don't lie. This
chalky material was uranium before this incident. Many a night I
have laid in my bed thinking about what happened.
I think the UFO needed the uranium for some reason.
Interpretation of this event is that a demonstration was made
regarding the use of uranium. If UFO needed raw or processed
uranium, certainly given the advanced capabilities displayed, they
could have taken as much as they wanted from any source.
If that were the intent you would see much more of that kind
of activity around these mines and likely we would be dealing with
losses at facilities where processed material is stored, which is
simply not supported by the sighting data available. In this case
however what we have is a known quality and quantity of raw material
that is days away from being extracted.
Right in front of the workers this UFO comes down and renders
the uranium worthless in an area large enough to get attention.
There are no other events on subsequent days. Just this one. This
surely got the attention of any engineering personnel working on the
project. It is likely that the information was forwarded to the AEC
or another government agency.
Another event was probably noted by the government for its
specificity in dealing with nuclear technology.
The pressure was maintained.
Weapons Component and Chemical Manufacturing
There were likely
events occurring over plants that may have been involved in materials
used in processing weapons fuel. More work is needed for this
Weapons Dismantling Facility (Pantex, Texas)
This should provide some recent activity
if they are monitoring our progress.
Power Outage Events –
conflict related? Nuclear related? (Vietnam – many events)
possible that the power outage events of the 1960’s and 1970’s were
responses to political/military actions? The many articles and books
indicate the immense depth of political turmoil brought on by the
The controversy over the courses of action and the lack of a
clear plan based on sound intelligence and analysis brought the public
in on the political fray. These sentiments were shared by the public
of allied countries as well. From the controversial Tonkin Gulf
Resolution (possible UFO involvement in this incident) on we were
in over our heads.
Documentation from several government sources reveal that
discussions to utilize nuclear weapons came up on several occasions.
Early in 1965, President Johnson had initiated a massive bombing
campaign in Vietnam that continued throughout the year.
What happened towards November of that year?
If indeed the Northeastern US power outage of that year was
initiated by UFO, what was the message?
What prompted that action?
Was Johnson initiating a nuclear option?
There were serious nuclear bomber training missions from an
aircraft carrier in the Vietnam region the summer of that year. A
clear picture has not yet emerged and further historical research is
needed to look for the correlative relationship.
The other outage events have to be evaluated as well.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Japanese friends and associates have shed much light on these
events. It doesn’t take long for the importance and horrific nature to
set in when you study them. While it is common knowledge among some of
those who were there at the time of the bombing that UFO were present
weeks and perhaps months before and after, there is little known
evidence to support this.
After the bombing there were efforts to study the affects by
Americans from many different disciplines. Film and camera crews
accompanied them documenting every aspect of these affects. Included
in the photographic records are probably hundreds of pictures and film
footage of the UFO present on a daily basis.
While a few pictures are posted on the Internet that appear to
include UFO, a more robust photographic record will be needed to set
the record straight. Additionally, there are probably some written
accounts of the UFO surveillance.
There can be no doubt that there was much outward interest and
concern displayed during this unique and horrific time in human
Naval Nuclear Launch Submarines
Deployment of submarines is unique due to the ability to
close in to specific locations. Many of these sightings involve UFO
submerging in and exiting the oceans.
Treaties and Their Role
Is it possible that related UFO activity had a small influence on
treaties? It is hard to ignore the distinct possibility that UFO have
pressured our governments indirectly.
Today researchers are in a unique position. A plethora of
nuclear historical information is available from many sources.
Thanks to the hard work of many individuals, large numbers of
sightings at sensitive installations have been documented and put into
databases for study. The time is right to put new efforts into
understanding the historical significance of these military UFO sightings.
indeed, these events are as relational as it now seems, we may begin to
understand their role.
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 2:26
Subject: Contatto dal dominio
am the author of the "Nuclear Historical Correlative Research" article
on the NICAP website.
long time ago I discovered that our policy and developments were very
closely tracked by some "others" and at specific critical times during
that history we were and continue to be warned. I learned of the ancient
presence and the existence of a record with regard to this presence.
The first observations were pictorial in nature - old frescos and paintings,
petroglyphs and other ancient crude recordings. I knew early
on that the church had knowledge of this history and while blatantly
displaying it throughout the world, they were actively denying to the
masses that such matters had merit.
have been to the Vatican. I know. I
decided that in order to understand the nature of current activity
relative to our nuclear ambitions I needed to have a contextual
reference - a good understanding of the past. I read many books on this
matter, but eventually focused on Sitchin. I was
dismissive about his interpretation of the apocalyptic nature of Nibiru's encounter with
really seemed like he was choosing interpretation to fit his hypotheses
- something to be avoided if you want to be taken seriously. I am still
reticent to some degree on this. But, I also know the incredible merits
and accuracy of the rest of that recorded history.
it becomes difficult to discount.
The arguments presented on this very informative website have
really brought this historical account into focus. I am not sure at this
point how this affects the context I seek regarding what I have studied
about the events taking place since WW2. I have read a small portion of
what you offer on your website.
was selective reading to address specific points I was struggling with.
While I think I have a good understanding of the events of our history
now, I still lack a contextual relationship to our nuclear era
interference. I would appreciate any direction to specific reading
or even better, your insight on this concern.
am looking for the reason that his activity is important regarding our
decisions between now and the supposed catastrophic events of